Wednesday, 19 April 2017 by Unknown

How to Solve Marketing's Consent / Privacy Dilemna

Make no bones about it Privacy and Consent are now the biggest buzzwords in Direct Marketing. Cut to frantic scenes in compliance and marketing departments across the UK trying to figure out what the best approach is to take...
Is it a question of damned if you do and damned if you dont?
But before we all start ripping up marketing techniques that have been tried and tested over the last twenty years (since Data Protection Act of 1998 and 2003s PECR), lets start with performing a simple test on how you treat marketing communications with prospects and customers by applying The Granny Test:
Put yourselves in the shoes of your granny and think how she would feel if she received the latest DM pack, email or phone-call as part of a direct-marketing campaign. Youll get one of two answers:
  1. Shes worried/concerned/surprised to hear from the brand
  2. She understands the reason for contact and accept/ignores or declines the offer
Of course, eliciting answer No.2 means youve probably got the correct consent/opt-in whilst respecting her privacy. Anything else, means you have to go back down the mine and work out why your granny doesnt understand the reason for contact.
Best practice is no longer an aspiration but the absolute minimum for direct marketing post GDPR. GDPR sounds onerous (it is in terms of administration!) but does attempt to crystalise how everyone would prefer to be contacted via marketing channels. Compliance can no longer be seen as a barrier, but another way to enable better marketing results through fairer legal means.
From personal experience, recent conversations with client brands have resurfaced some age old questions around consent, opt-in and privacy. Actually it is now easier to answer those questions with a stricter ICO interpretation of data laws using GDPR.
One such dilemma is Should we use company name or brand name opt-in statement? On the face of it, the benefits of a company wide opt-in are obvious, offering multiple brand opt-ins and total communication flexibility. However caution must be urged - do your prospects/customers most commonly associate with the brand or the company? Apply the Granny Test and youll quickly get the answer you need! Under GDPR using a company opt-in to send marketing comms from a brand a prospect is unfamiliar with, is likely to suffer the wrath of the ICO as you will need to prove that the original opt-in consent scope is tight enough to allow this type of brand contact.
It seems only yesterday that pressure on companies to get serious about consent was at breaking point but looking back to 2015 the red flags were flying and highlighted (in no subtle terms) in a previous blog How to fix Direct Marketing Biggest Problem
2018 will be the year of reckoning for all those in the Direct Marketing game, so spend 2017 huddling together to solve your Consent / Privacy dilemmas, before the ICO (painfully) solves it for you.

Thursday, 12 January 2017 by Unknown

Automatic for the People?

Michael Knight escapes KITT(image thanks to Silver Blue)
"End Tech Disruption, Start Tech Enhancement"
Constant social media updates flood our news feeds daily about how yet another industry is disrupted by new technology.... and how wonderful this is because now a computer automates a task faster and cheaper than ever before. 
But wait... theres a catch or more a hidden story. That is, the lives of the people this technology disrupts. Disruption is rarely all good, indeed the definition is: disturbance or problems that interrupt an event, activity, or process - doesnt sound too rosy now, does it? Yet we are sold on the idea that disruption by tech is all good, inevitable, unavoidable and that if we cant see the advantage now, we will all benefit in the future.
Take Uber as a classic example of disruptive technology. The platform disrupts by removing the inconvenience of getting a taxi at short notice which was an inherent flaw with the offline taxi rank/office/black cab industry. So far, so good. However looking at the numbers, this company just cant make money with its current driver model. It just lost another $800m last quarter and on track to lose $3 billion by year end! It wont take a genius to guess that it will only ever likely turn a profit when a driverless model is the prevailing service.
So like the offline taxi model, Uber appears to carry a flaw (this time weighing c. 62kg) in its underlying model. As an Uber user, I like the convenience but I also love that fact that Uber provides someone with a new way to earn an income. Without a 62kg human driver, I could quite easily fall out of love with Uber.
Next time you are sold the next great tech disruption consider the downsides and how maybe technology should be evaluated on the enhancement it makes to us humans rather than purely as a cool disruptive influence. With this kind of thinking, better, more profitable and an altogether more humanistic approach can create tech business models that mutually benefit customers, employees and society at large (and dont even get me started on big corp taxes!).

Tuesday, 2 August 2016 by Unknown

Robots to run Direct Marketing Industry within 5 years

Image credit: Takahiro Kyono 
Lets face it, rising automation using marketing platforms and programmatic buying are merely tip of the iceberg stuff. 

Lurking underneath is the potential for a vast Uberesque style total robotisation of marketing and inparticular direct marketing.

Back in 2014, Forbes were already making predictions about how marketing robots will easily overcome any human objections in time and so change the future of marketing.

That future is now...

Take a look at all those other industries that claimed gut feel and human instinct were the key to success. Were 15 years since Moneyball tactics cracked baseball wide open. It is probably mostly down to human resistance that further contagion in sports still only ripples across NBA Championship basketball (Golden State Warriors, 2015 winners) and Premier League football (Leicester City, 2015/16 winners). The rise of data, via automation to robotisation is an unstoppable truth.

Stop and be honest - consider how your job may be done better by a robot? Once companies have figured this out (for you), the only big players left in town will be those who can collaborate effectively in partnership with robots. The safe(er) jobs in robot marketing world are likely to be across these areas:

  • Data Analysts/Scientists
  • Big ticket Account Directors
  • C level roles (dont think were asking for any robot CEOs just yet!)
  • Programmers
  • Creatives/Ideas (but not template design)

As we puny humans, cling on the remnants of the Mad Men advertising era, get ready as we are enter the age of the Sane Robot marketing epoch.

Tuesday, 29 September 2015 by Unknown

How to Fix Direct Marketing Biggest Problem

Photo credit:
What is the BIG question every consumer asks when faced with a seemingly out of the blue marketing phone call, SMS or email?
Answer: "Where did you get my details from?" you scream...
Of course, no matter how great the product/service or how perfectly timed the contact, you will always see a minority of people wholl complain about the marketing intrusion even though its 100% compliant (well it was yesterday!). So putting that small proportion of consumers who suffer from compliant marketing to one side....
However we can do something to help the vast majority of complainers and answer the single big question above by stopping the use of data sourced from anonymous third party marketing opt-in tickboxes. The standard opt-in tickbox wording tends to state carefully selected partners may contact you about relevant marketing offers. The biggest problem with the phrase carefully selected partners - is that it provides next to zero protection and traceability for consumers to establish how their details were passed on - surely they have a right to know?
Lets now imagine a new world where all data used for direct marketing was labelled with origin of place and date of opt-in. If we ask the BIG consumer question again:
Question: Where did you get my details from?
Answer: Looking at our records, I can see you opted into xxxx list/site on 1st May 2015
Hey presto! This sounds fair. The result of this additional key info to each data record has three benefits:
  1. Puts the consumer at ease that you are a bona-fide company who cares where their details originated
  2. Increases the chance of a positive experience and resulting transaction taking place
  3. Reduces the probability that complaints get escalated to the ICO, DMA, FRSB - or any number of other regulators, media outlets and government departments
So it could be time for the whole Direct Marketing industry to swallow hard and take a leap into a world of ethically sourced data AND being happy to prove it to consumers on demand.
To break the status quo and raise the best practice bar to ethical status, we need to:
  • Ban sales of generic anonymous third party marketing opt-in data which emanates from risky third party marketing statements
  • Stamp each data record used for marketing with place of origin and date of opt-in. This information must be freely available to consumers in print on email, paper or spoken word,
The BIG Question is...
Whos in?

Friday, 1 May 2015 by Unknown

Co-registration - Every Marketer's Guilty Pleasure?

Credit: flickr thepeachmartini
You mention co-reg and most marketers will fall into one of three categories:
  1. Er, whats this co-registration thingy about again?
  2. Tried it, didnt work for me
  3. I love it, but Im not going to brag about it
If you answered 1, 2 or 3 you need to keep reading...
It may not be sexy or what you always dreamed of in your formative years at Marketing School... but, damn, what wont win best looks in a marketing beauty contest does deliver stonking results!
Using the UK market as an example, what other channel can give you....
 ... opt-in email leads for 50p which convert at 30% to double opt-in (DOI)?
... telephone leads for £1 which convert to sale at 10-15% on calling?
(Contact me if you want case studies)
The uniqueness of co-reg bobbing amongst the sea of lead generation channels is what makes it unrivaled in terms of performance and misunderstanding in equal measures.

What makes it unique

  • Only lead gen channel purely priced on cost per lead (CPL)
  • Highest opt-in rate from impression - think 5% versus 0.5% on performance display ads or email marketing
  • Huge scale - 1 million UK leads in a month is doable
  • Lowest cost in generating leads compared with other channels
  • 1-click sign-up - hyper convenient for consumers to opt-in

Why is it misunderstood

  • Driven by native style advertising
  • Youre unlikely to stumble across a co-reg site - they have no SEO value as Google bot crawlers cant creep past the initial registration page so you must be driven there by push email, display, mobile marketing
  • Dual registration process means you need to appreciate how opt-in consent and privacy policies work
  • Predominance of competition style publisher sites
  • Huge variance in lead quality from best to worst from similar looking sites
  • Labour intensive to manage the data without the right know-how and lead management technology
  • Not taught at any level from degree to professional qualification
  • Co-reg ads are an ugly name! Sign-up ads are a better expression!

Whats new?

This is the reveal moment, because the new and improved sign-ups (aka co-reg) are actually starting to look more easy on the eye these days. Heres why?
  • Big brand content publishers integrating sign-ups into their advertising suite - from Dennis Publishing to the Daily Mail Group
  • Lead management platforms are increasingly tidying up the messy side of handling leads to deliver fuss-free automated campaigns
  • Lead scoring means you can slice and dice your audience into look-a-like customers rather than use generic lead capture
  • Geo-demographic targeting works because a bigger audience means zoning in on the right target with a profiled sign-up advert.
  • Improved retargeting by database building at super low cost
So whilst traditional co-registration will always remain a guilty pleasure, you may yet come to openly show your love for sign-ups instead.
Show your love now by liking or commenting below.